RFC7844 DHCPv4 summary and comments

In order to reveal less identifying information, the options in DHCP should be reduced in number and be more “homogenous” for all implementations, as stated in [RFC 7844#section-2.4].:

The design of the Anonymity Profiles attempts to minimize the number
of options and the choice of values, in order to reduce the
possibilities of operating system fingerprinting.

To reveal still less identifying information most of the MAY, SHOULD keywords should be replaced by MUST or MUST NOT.

Most of the comments here are regarding the verbs (key words [RFC 2119]) used.

See RFC7844 DHCPv4 restricted version summary for what would be a more restricitive version of [RFC 7844], where the keywords are actually replaced. Use diff to see specific differences between these two documents.

Note

Extracts from the [RFC 7844] marked as literal blocks.

Message types

DHCP*

[RFC 7844#section-3.1]:

SHOULD randomize the ordering of options

This could be s/SHOULD/MUST

If this can not be implemented
MAY order the options by option code number (lowest to highest).

This could be s/MAY/MUST

DHCPDISCOVER

[RFC 7844#section-3.]:

MUST contain the Message Type option,
MAY contain the Client Identifier option,
MAY contain the Parameter Request List option.

This could be s/MAY/MUST NOT, though:

  • Some servers will not answer to clients that does not contain the Client Identifier

  • what RFC for DHCP server says about it?:

    SHOULD NOT contain any other option.
    

This could be s/SHOULD NOT/MUST NOT

DHCPREQUEST

[RFC 7844#section-3.]:

MUST contain the Message Type option,
MAY contain the Client Identifier option,
MAY contain the Parameter Request List option.
SHOULD NOT contain any other option.

MAY, SHOULD NOT as in DHCPDISCOVER:

If in response to a DHCPOFFER,
MUST contain the corresponding Server Identifier option
MUST contain the Requested IP address option.

If the message is not in response to a DHCPOFFER (BOUND, RENEW),
MAY contain a Requested IP address option

This could be s/MAY/MUST?

DHCPDECLINE

[RFC 7844#section-3.]:

MUST contain the Message Type option,
MUST contain the Server Identifier option,
MUST contain the Requested IP address option;
MAY contain the Client Identifier option.

MAY as in DHCPDISCOVER

Why here there is not SHOULD NOT as in DHCPDISCOVER

DHCPRELEASE

[RFC 7844#section-3.]:

MUST contain the Message Type option and
MUST contain the Server Identifier option,
MAY contain the Client Identifier option.

MAY as in DHCPDISCOVER

To do not leak when the client leaves the network, this message type should not be implemented.

In this case, servers might run out of leases, but that is something that servers should fix decreasing the lease time.

DHCPINFORM

[RFC 7844#section-3.]:

MUST contain the Message Type option,
MAY contain the Client Identifier option,
MAY contain the Parameter Request List option.

It SHOULD NOT contain any other option.

MAY, SHOULD NOT as in DHCPDISCOVER

Message Options

Client IP address (ciaddr)

[RFC 7844#section-3.2]:

MUST NOT include in the message a Client IP address that has been obtained
with a different link-layer address.

Requested IP Address Option (code 50)

[RFC 7844#section-3.3]:

SHOULD NOT use the Requested IP address option in DHCPDISCOVER messages.
MUST use the option when mandated (DHCPREQUEST)
If in INIT-REBOOT:
SHOULD perform a complete four-way handshake, starting with a DHCPDISCOVER

If the client can ascertain that this is exactly the same network to which it was previously connected, and if the link-layer address did not change,
MAY issue a DHCPREQUEST to try to reclaim the current address.

Client Hardware Address Field

[RFC 7844#section-3.4]:

The presence of this address is necessary for the proper operation of the DHCP
service.

What should be interpreted as MUST:

If the hardware address is reset to a new
randomized value, the DHCP client SHOULD use the new randomized value
in the DHCP messages

The client should be restarted when the hardware address changes and use the current address instead of the permanent one.

Client Identifier Option (code 61)

[RFC 7844#section-3.5]:

DHCP
clients MUST use client identifiers based solely on the link-layer
address that will be used in the underlying connection.

As in DHCPDISCOVER, it SHOULD NOT have this option

Parameter Request List Option (PRL) (code 55)

[RFC 7844#section-3.6]:

SHOULD only request a minimal number of options in the PRL and
SHOULD also randomly shuffle the ordering of option codes in the PRL.
If this random ordering cannot be implemented,
MAY order the option codes in the PRL by option code number (lowest to highest).

As in DHCPDISCOVER

Host Name option (code 12)

[RFC 7844#section-3.7]:

SHOULD NOT send the Host Name option.
If they choose to send the option [..]

As in DHCPDISCOVER

Client FQDN Option (code 81)

[RFC 7844#section-3.8]:

SHOULD NOT include the Client FQDN option

As in DHCPDISCOVER

MAY include a special-purpose FQDN using the same host name as in the
Host Name option, with a suffix matching the connection-specific DNS
suffix being advertised by that DHCP server.

reason why it MAY:

Having a name in the
DNS allows working with legacy systems that require one to be there

UUID/GUID-Based Client Machine Identifier Option (code 97)

[RFC 7844#section-3.9]:

This option is part of a set of options for the
Intel Preboot eXecution Environment (PXE)

Common sense seems to
dictate that getting a new operating system from an unauthenticated
server at an untrusted location is a really bad idea and that even if
the option was available users would not activate it.

Nodes visiting untrusted networks MUST NOT send or use the PXE options.

User and Vendor Class DHCP Options

[RFC 7844#section-3.10]:

SHOULD NOT use the
Vendor-Specific Information option (code 43), the Vendor Class
Identifier option (code 60), the V-I Vendor Class option (code 124),
or the V-I Vendor-Specific Information option (code 125),

This could be s/SHOULD NOT/MUST NOT?

Operational considerations

[RFC 7844#section-5.]:

Implementers SHOULD provide a way for clients to control when the
anonymity profiles are used and when standard behavior is preferred.

Not specified in RFC7844, but in RFC2131

Probe the offered IP

[RFC 2131#section-2.2]:

the allocating
server SHOULD probe the reused address before allocating the address,
e.g., with an ICMP echo request, and the client SHOULD probe the
newly received address, e.g., with ARP.

 The client SHOULD perform a
check on the suggested address to ensure that the address is not
already in use.  For example, if the client is on a network that
supports ARP, the client may issue an ARP request for the suggested
request.  When broadcasting an ARP request for the suggested address,
the client must fill in its own hardware address as the sender's
hardware address, and 0 as the sender's IP address, to avoid
confusing ARP caches in other hosts on the same subnet.>>

The client SHOULD broadcast an ARP
reply to announce the client's new IP address and clear any outdated
ARP cache entries in hosts on the client's subnet.

This could be s/SHOULD/MUST.

Retransmission delays

Sending DHCPDISCOVER [RFC 2131#section-4.4.1]:

The client SHOULD wait a random time between one and ten seconds to
   desynchronize the use of DHCP at startup.

[RFC 2131#section-3.1]:

a client retransmitting as described in section 4.1 might retransmit the
DHCPREQUEST message four times, for a total delay of 60 seconds

[RFC 2131#section-4.4.5]:

In both RENEWING and REBINDING states,
if the client receives no response to its DHCPREQUEST
message, the client SHOULD wait one-half of the remaining
time until T2 (in RENEWING state) and one-half of the
remaining lease time (in REBINDING state), down to a
minimum of 60 seconds, before retransmitting the
DHCPREQUEST message.

[RFC 2131#section-4.1]:

For example, in a 10Mb/sec Ethernet
internetwork, the delay before the first retransmission SHOULD be 4
seconds randomized by the value of a uniform random number chosen
from the range -1 to +1

Clients with clocks that provide resolution
granularity of less than one second may choose a non-integer
randomization value.

The delay before the next retransmission SHOULD
be 8 seconds randomized by the value of a uniform number chosen from
the range -1 to +1.

The retransmission delay SHOULD be doubled with
subsequent retransmissions up to a maximum of 64 seconds.

Selecting offer algorithm

[RFC 2131#section-4.2]:

DHCP clients are free to use any strategy in selecting a DHCP server
among those from which the client receives a DHCPOFFER message.

client may choose to collect several DHCPOFFER
messages and select the "best" offer.

If the client receives no acceptable offers, the client
may choose to try another DHCPDISCOVER message.

[RFC 2131#section-4.4.1]:

The client collects DHCPOFFER messages over a period of time, selects
one DHCPOFFER message from the (possibly many) incoming DHCPOFFER
messages

The time
over which the client collects messages and the mechanism used to
select one DHCPOFFER are implementation dependent.

Timers

[RFC 2131#section-4.4.5]:

Times T1 and T2 are configurable by the server through options.  T1
defaults to (0.5 * duration_of_lease).  T2 defaults to (0.875 *
duration_of_lease).  Times T1 and T2 SHOULD be chosen with some
random "fuzz" around a fixed value, to avoid synchronization of
client reacquisition.

Leases

[RFC 7844#section-3.3]:

There are scenarios in which a client connecting to a network
remembers a previously allocated address, i.e., when it is in the
INIT-REBOOT state.  In that state, any client that is concerned with
privacy SHOULD perform a complete four-way handshake, starting with a
DHCPDISCOVER, to obtain a new address lease.  If the client can
ascertain that this is exactly the same network to which it was
previously connected, and if the link-layer address did not change,
the client MAY issue a DHCPREQUEST to try to reclaim the current
address.